Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. G.g. Automotive Gears Limited

High Court 21 Jul 2009 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

21 Jul 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. G.g. Automotive Gears Limited, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections and / or to serve unserved respondent, appeal shall stand dismissed against the unserved respondent without reference to the Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1083 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 2, MumbaiVersus ..Appellant. G.G. Automotive Gears Limited ..Respondent. Mr.A.S. Shivsharan for the appellant.None for the respondent. I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1097/2009 ANDI. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1099/2009 I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1100/2009 AND I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1101/2009 I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1102/2009 AND I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1107/2009 I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1109/2009 AND I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1112/2009 I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1113/2009 AND I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1116/2009 I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1120/2009 AND I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1124/2009 I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1125/2009 AND I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1127/2009 I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1130/2009 AND I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1131/2009 I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1132/2009 AND I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1133/2009 I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1138/2009 ANDAND I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1139/2009I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1149/2009I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1149/2009 I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1142/2009 I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1150/2009 ANDANDANDAND I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1161/2009 I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1165/2009 I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1166/2009 I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1167/2009I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1175/2009I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1175/2009 I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1172/2009 I. TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1176/2009 CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 21ST JULY, 2009. P.C. : Appellant is directed to remove office objections, if any, and serve unserved respondent within eight weeks from today. Hamdust allowed. In addition to hamdast service, private service by R.P.A.D. / Speed post is permitted. Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections and / or to serve unserved respondent, appeal shall stand dismissed against the unserved respondent without reference to the Court. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.