The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Mumbai v. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd
High Court
11 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Mumbai v. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd
Date of order
11 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Mumbai v. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Following the said judgment, this appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 160 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax-2,Mumbai.. .........Appellant. VersusMahindra & Mahindra Ltd. ..........Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. Mr. Sanjiv Shah for the Respondent.
CORAM :BILAL NAZKIandA. A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ.DATED :11TH AUGUST, 2008.
P.C.:
It is submitted at the Bar that this case is covered by the judgment ofthe Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v/sCatapharma (India) P. Ltd., reported in [2007] 292 ITR 641 (SC), in favourof the assessee. Following the said judgment, this appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-
(BILAL NAZKI, J.)
Sd/-
(A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue