The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -2 Mumbai v. M/S Union Bank Of India
High Court
28 Nov 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -2 Mumbai v. M/S Union Bank Of India
Date of order
28 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -2 Mumbai v. M/S Union Bank Of India, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeals are disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Ladda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTEREST TAX APPEAL No. 19 of 2009WITH INTEREST TAX APPEAL No. 20 of 2009WITH INTEREST TAX APPEAL No. 21 of 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax -2 Mumbai
... Appellant.
Versus
M/s Union Bank of India
... Respondent.
Mr Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
Mr P.P. Tipnis i/by Consulta Juris for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.R. Joshi, JJ.DATE : 28[th] November,2011.
P.C. :-
1.Counsel for the parties state that in view of the fact that the decision of the ITAT in the case of assessee has been subsequently not followed in the case of Gujarat Gas Financial Services Ltd vs. ACIT reported in [2008] 115 ITD 218 (AHD), the order of the ITAT dated 13[th] April, 2007 pertaining to the Interest Tax Appeal Nos.28, 29 and 93/MUM/2001 relating to AYs-1996-97, 1997-98 and 1998-99 be quashed and set aside and the matter be restored to the file of the ITAT for fresh consideration in accordance with law. Accordingly, the order dated 13[th] April, 2007, which is impugned in the present appeal, is
Ladda
quashed and set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the ITAT for fresh consideration in accordance with law. The appeals are disposed of accordingly.
(A.R.Joshi,J)
(J.P.Devadhar,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.