Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. M/S.binani Metals Limited, Mumbai

High Court 18 Sep 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. M/S.binani Metals Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
18 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. M/S.binani Metals Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Admit on the following substantial question of law : “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in upholding the order of learned IT (A) in cancelling the penalty of Rs.66.7 lac levied u/s.

Decision: 3.In this view of the matter, the appeal is disposed of in terms of this order with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1785 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus M/s.Binani Metals Limited, Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 18TH SEPTEMBER 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard learned counsel for the parties. Admit on the following substantial question of law : “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in upholding the order of learned IT (A) in cancelling the penalty of Rs.66.7 lac levied u/s. 271(1)(c) following the Decision of the Apex Court in the case of M/s.Virtual Soft Systems Limited whereas, the larger Bench of the Apex Court in CIT -1, Ahmadabad Vs. Gold Coil Health Food Limited dated 18-8-2008 overruled the said decision ? 2.The tribunal has dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue, relying upon the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Virtual Soft Systems Limited reported in 289 ITR 83. The said judgment is no longer a good law in view of the subsequent Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Gold Coin Health Food Limited reported in 305 ITR 308. In this view of the matter, the appeal is allowed by setting aside the impugned order. The matter is to be remanded back to the tribunal for consideration afresh in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Gold Coin Health Food Limited (Supra). 3.In this view of the matter, the appeal is disposed of in terms of this order with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan