The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. M/S.ecd Electronics & Electrolysis P. Ltd
High Court
01 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. M/S.ecd Electronics & Electrolysis P. Ltd
Date of order
01 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. M/S.ecd Electronics & Electrolysis P. Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3408 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.992 OF 2010
ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3409 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4096 OF 2010
ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3428 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3999 OF 2010
ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3475 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6145 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai
Versus
M/s.ECD Electronics & Electrolysis P. Ltd.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Paras Savla for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 1[st] July, 2011.
1.By consent, All the Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Place the appeals for admission on 8[th] July 2011.
(Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue