The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. M/S.state Bank Of India, Mumbai
High Court
08 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. M/S.state Bank Of India, Mumbai
Date of order
08 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. M/S.state Bank Of India, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.Hence all the appeals stand disposed of with liberty to the Revenue to apply for restoration, if permission is received from COD.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) Nos.3793, 3794, 3795 & 3796 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 2, MumbaiVersusM/s.State Bank of India, Mumbai
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3866 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – I, MumbaiV/s.General Insurance Corporation of India, Mumbai
..Appellant
..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 8[th] JULY, 2009
P.C. :
1.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that before preferring the above appeals, permission from COD was not obtained. In this view of the matter, the above appeals stand dismissed with liberty to apply for recall of the order, if the appellant receives permission from COD.
2.Hence all the appeals stand disposed of with liberty to the Revenue to apply for restoration, if permission is received from COD.
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue