Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. M/S.tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Limited

High Court 16 Nov 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. M/S.tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Limited
Date of order
16 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
1992-93
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. M/S.tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: DATE : 16th November 2011 P.C. : 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the proceedings initiated by the assessing officer to re-open the assessment for assessment year 1992-93 was invalid is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6036 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Limited..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Ajit Shah with Mr.Shrihar Iyer for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ. DATE : 16th November 2011 P.C. : 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the proceedings initiated by the assessing officer to re-open the assessment for assessment year 1992-93 was invalid is the question raised in this appeal. 2.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in para-6 of its order has recorded a finding of fact that in the present case notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued beyond the period of four years from the end of relevant assessment year and there is no material on record to suggest that there was failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment. 3.In view of this finding, which is uncontroverted, we see no reason to entertain this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (A.R. Joshi, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan