The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. M/S.tirumal Impex Pvt. Limited, Mumbai
High Court
02 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. M/S.tirumal Impex Pvt. Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
02 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai v. M/S.tirumal Impex Pvt. Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.The appeal has no merit and the same is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2629 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 2, Mumbai..Appellant.VersusM/s.Tirumal Impex Pvt. Limited, Mumbai..Respondent.
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 2[nd] July, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue.
2.The notice, which is returned unserved with postal remark “not
known” cannot be treated as good service.
3.The appeal has no merit and the same is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue