The Commissioner Of Income Tax -2, Mumbai v. State Bank Of India
High Court
26 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax -2, Mumbai v. State Bank Of India
Date of order
26 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax -2, Mumbai v. State Bank Of India, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the appeal stand disposed of with liberty to the Revenue to apply for restoration, if permission is received from COD.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1922 OF 2009
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.738 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax -2, MumbaiVersusState Bank of India
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 26th JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that before preferring the above appeal, permission from COD was not obtained. In this view of the matter, the above appeal stands dismissed with liberty to apply for recall of the order, if the appellant receives permission from COD. Hence, the appeal stand disposed of with liberty to the Revenue to apply for restoration, if permission is received from COD.
2.In view of the dismissal of the appeal, Notice of Motion do not survive. Hence the same stand dismissed.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue