In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax 2 v. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1847 OF 2009
IN
The Commissioner of Income-tax 2.... Applicantvs.
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd..... Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for Applicant.
Mr.Sanjiv M. Shah for Respondent.
----
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED :19[th] JUNE, 2009
P.C.:
Heard learned Counsel for the parties. For the reasons stated in the Affidavit, delay is condoned. Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer (a). Motion is disposed of.
[J.P. DEVADHAR, J.]
[V.C. DAGA, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.