Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2 v. M/...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2 v. M/S Indian Pharma Caps And Chemicals Pvt. Ltd

High Court 15 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2 v. M/S Indian Pharma Caps And Chemicals Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
15 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2 v. M/S Indian Pharma Caps And Chemicals Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs..

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1101 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 2,Vs.M/s Indian Pharma Caps And Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.Mr.S.G. Dalal for the Respondent. P.C. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR ,JJ. 15[th] June,2009 DATE : Perused the impugned order passed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal has clearly recorded a finding that on reopening of the assessment the assessee has disclosed all material facts fully and truly and there was no failure on the part of the assessee. In view of this finding, no substantial question of law is involved in the appeal. The appeal is therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan