The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Jogani Constrtuction Ltd
High Court
29 Jan 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Jogani Constrtuction Ltd
Date of order
29 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
2000-01
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Jogani Constrtuction Ltd, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was justified in allowing the claim of interest u/s.
Decision: 4)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ASN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.860 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-2...Appellant.
v.
M/s. Jogani Constrtuction Ltd...Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta, Sr. Advocate i/by Ms. Padma Divakar for the Appellant.
Ms.Aasifa Khan i/by Ashok J. Patil for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 29TH JANUARY, 2013
PC:
In this appeal by the revenue for assessment year
2000-01 the revenue has formulated the following question of law for our consideration.
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the
case and in law the Tribunal was justified in allowing the claim of interest u/s. 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act,1961 amounting to Rs.94,31,538 even though such interest expenditure pertained to
an incomplete project of the assessee Company and the Assessee Company was following the “Project Completion” method of accounting wherein expenses incurred on incomplete projects were being shown as Work in Progress?
2)By the impugned order the Tribunal has allowed the assessee's appeal by following its decision in assessee's own case for earlier years. We are informed that the appeals filed by revenue for earlier years 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-2000 against the order of the Tribunal granting relief to the respondent assessee has been dismissed.
3)In view of the above, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law.
4)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.