In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Raymond Limited, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3454 of 2009IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.144 OF 2008WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3455 of 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.120 OF 2008WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3456 of 2009IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.121 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-2.. Appellant.Vs.M/s. Raymond Limited.. Respondent.
....
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.
Mr. P.J. Pardiwala, Senior Advocate i/b Gagrats for the Respondent.
....
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
P.C.:
The Notices of Motion have been taken out for setting aside the dismissal of the appeal in default for non-compliance with a conditional order passed by this Court for removal of office objections. There is a delay in taking out the Notices of Motion which is satisfactorily explained. The Motions for restoration are not opposed and are accordingly made absolute in terms of
prayer clauses A and B.
Time for removal of office objections is extended by a period of one week from today.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.