The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S.apsara Plastics Pvt. Ltd
High Court
21 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S.apsara Plastics Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
21 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S.apsara Plastics Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2733 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-2 )..AppellantVs.M/s.Apsara Plastics Pvt. Ltd., )..Respondents
)..Respondents
----
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Mr. S.E.Dastur Senior Counsel @ Mr.P.J.Pardiwala Sr.Counsel and Mr.A.K.Jasani for the respondents.
----
CORAM : J. P .DEVADHAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 21/2/2011.
PC
1The question raised in this appeal is as under :-
“Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that
sharpener body, geometrical instruments and cutter body
produced by the assessee were manufactured products so as to avail benefit of Section 80 IA of the Income Tax Act”?
2Perusal of the impugned order shows that the Tribunal has recorded a finding of fact that the items produced by the assessee
are distinct marketable products and hence they are manufactured
products. Assessee has also filed an affidavit before us to show that the raw material used as well as the final products are classified under different headings in the Central Excise Tariff.
3In this view of the matter, we see no reason to interfere with the order passed by the Tribunal. Appeal is dismissed.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.