Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S.sanghvi Woods Pvt.ltd

High Court 05 Oct 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S.sanghvi Woods Pvt.ltd
Date of order
05 Oct 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S.sanghvi Woods Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the Assessee is engaged in the manufacture of pencil slats by relying upon the judgment of this court in the case of Patel Stationers Pvt.Ltd. and Kirti Stationers Pvt.Ltd. is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: Accordingly, appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ttm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1453 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-2 .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Sanghvi Woods Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant Mr.S.E.Dastur, Sr.Advocate, Mr.P.J.Pardiwala, Sr.Advocate, Mr.Madhur Agarwal and Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & K.K. TATED, JJ.DATE: 5TH OCTOBER, 2011. P.C. 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the Assessee is engaged in the manufacture of pencil slats by relying upon the judgment of this court in the case of Patel Stationers Pvt.Ltd. and Kirti Stationers Pvt.Ltd. is the question raised in this appeal. 2. Although the ITAT has relied upon the judgment of the sister concern of the Assessee, in the present case, an affidavit has been filed by the Director of the respondent Assessee to demonstrate that the production of the articles in question constitute manufacture under the Central Excise Act and accordingly, the assessee has obtained necessary Excise Certificate for of the Assessee, in the present case, an affidavit has been filed by the Director of the respondent Assessee to demonstrate that the production of the articles in question constitute manufacture under the Central Excise Act and accordingly, the assessee has obtained necessary Excise Certificate for the manufacture of pencil slats from the excise authorities and also from the Joint Director of Industries (Jammu). In this view of the matter, no fault can be found with the decision of the ITAT that the products in question are manufactured items and that the assessee is entitled to the deduction claimed. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed. (K.K. TATED, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan