Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 20, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 20, Mumbai v. M/S.kmg Jewellery

High Court 01 Dec 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 20, Mumbai v. M/S.kmg Jewellery
Date of order
01 Dec 2011
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 20, Mumbai v. M/S.kmg Jewellery, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.In this view of the matter, the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 31[st] March 2011 in Income Tax Appeal No.275/Mum/08 relating to assessment year 2001-02 is quashed and set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for fresh decision in accor...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1284 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 20, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.KMG Jewellery..Respondent. Mr.D.K. Kamwal for the appellant.Mr.B.V. Jhaveri for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ. DATE : 1[st] December 2011 P.C. : 1.This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 31[st] March 2011 in Income Tax Appeal No.275/Mum/08 relating to assessment year 2001-02. 2.In the present case, assessment for assessment year 2001-02 was sought to be re-opened by issuing a notice dated 29[th] March 2006 which is within four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. 3.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in para-12 of its order has held that the re-assessment was void-ab-initio by relying upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Hindustan Lever Limited V/s. R.B. Wadkar reported in 268 ITR 332. The decision of this Court in the case of Hindustan Lever Limited (supra) related to re-opening of the assessment beyond the period of four years from the end of relevant assessment year, whereas, in the present case the re-opening of the assessment is within four years from the end of the relevant assessment year and, therefore, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was not justified in holding that the re-assessmet order was void-ab-initio by relying upon the decision of this Court in the case of Hindustan Lever Limited (supra). 4.In this view of the matter, the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 31[st] March 2011 in Income Tax Appeal No.275/Mum/08 relating to assessment year 2001-02 is quashed and set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for fresh decision in accordance with law. 5.The appeal is disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs. (A.R. Joshi, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan