In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 20, Mumbai v. M/S.united Impex (India, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.834 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 20, MumbaiVersusM/s.United Impex (India)
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.Ms.Aasifa Khan for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 26[th] JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.
Heard.
2.Since the question as framed in this appeal revolves around the findings of fact recorded by the tribunal, based on appreciation of evidence and reached the conclusion that there was no failure on the part of the assessee in disclosing all material facts and particulars fully and truly necessary for completion of assessment, no fault can be found with the view taken by the tribunal.
3.In this view of the matter, we see no question of law arising out of the tribunal. The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue