The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20, Mumbai v. Shri Anant R. Thakore Mumbai 400 069
High Court
13 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20, Mumbai v. Shri Anant R. Thakore Mumbai 400 069
Date of order
13 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
1989-2000
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20, Mumbai v. Shri Anant R. Thakore Mumbai 400 069, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 148 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax-20,Mumbai
v/sShri Anant R. ThakoreMumbai 400 069
… Appellant
… Respondent
Mrs S.V. Bharucha for Appellant. None for Respondent.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA AND
B.P. COLABAWALLA JJ.
DATE : 13[th] JANUARY, 2016
P.C.:-
1.This Appeal relates to Assessment Year 1989-2000 (Block period). Mrs Bharucha, learned counsel for the Revenue states that the tax effect involved in the present appeal as indicated in para 11 of the Appeal Memo is Rs.4,14,580/-. She further states that in view of the Central Board of Direct Tax Circular No.21/15 dated 10[th ]December 2015, the tax effect being less than the threshold limits provided therein for challenging an order of the Tribunal before this
Court, she does not press the present appeal.
2.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue