Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 v. M/S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 v. M/S. Aristo Exports

High Court 22 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 v. M/S. Aristo Exports
Date of order
22 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
2002-03, 2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 v. M/S. Aristo Exports, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal erred in confirming the deletion of addition made by the assessing Officer towards deduction u/s.

Decision: 3)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.739 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax-20. v. M/s. Aristo Exports. ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr. Abhay Ahuja for the Appellant.Mr. K.C.Pursty h/f. Ratan Kumar Samal for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 22ND JANUARY, 2013 PC: In this appeal by the revenue for assessment year 2002-03 following question of law has been raised for our consideration. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal erred in confirming the deletion of addition made by the assessing Officer towards deduction u/s. 80IB of the Income Tax Act,1961? 2)We find that the impugned order of the Tribunal relies upon its own decision on this very issue in the respondent assessee's own case for assessment year 2003-04. We are informed that the revenue has not preferred any appeal to this Court on this issue. No case is ASN made out to take a view different from the view taken by the Tribunal for assessment year 2003-04. In the circumstances, the proposed question of law cannot be entertained. 3)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan