In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 v. M/S. Madhusudan Sales Corporation, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal stands dismissed accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.826 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-20 : Appellant
v/s
M/s. Madhusudan Sales Corporation : Respondent
Mr. R. Asokan for Appellant
Mr. B.K. Bahl partner of respondent presentin person
Coram : Dr. S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.Date : 18.9.2008
P.C..Heard learned counsel for the appellant and
Mr. B.K. Bahl the partner of respondent’spartnership firm. The respondent’s partnership firmconsists of two partners namely B.K. Bahl and his
wife Mrs. Bahl who is personally present in court and
she has authorised Mr. Bahl to appear on her behalf.
.
We have perused the judgment and order of the
Tribunal dt. 28.12.2007. In the above Appeal the
appellant is seeking to raise the following question
of law.
"The Substantial question of law arises in thepresent appeal is regarding the true scope andcorrect interpretation of sec. 80 IB and
above. It is a mere finding of fact. Appeal stands
dismissed accordingly.
(S.J. Kathawalla,J.)
(Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.