In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 v. Shri Laxminarayan Agarwal, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The Appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. [R.M.SAVANT, J] [V C DAGA, J]
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IT APPEAL NO.2740-09
mmj
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2740 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-20 Vs.Shri Laxminarayan Agarwal
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the AppellantMr. K. Gopal a/w Mr. Jitendra Singh for the Respondent
P.C.
CORAM :V C DAGA AND R M SAVANT, JJ.DATE :20[th] September, 2010
1Heard learned Counsel for the Revenue and the Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent.
2The question sought to be raised relates to redetermination of the value of closing stock and consequent reflection thereof as the opening stock. The said issue has been dealt with by the Tribunal in paragraph 8 of its impugned order. The contentions of the revenue has not been disputed by the Assessee before the Tribunal. In that view of the matter, the Revenue can hardly be said to be aggrieved person entitled to file an Appeal. The Appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
[R.M.SAVANT, J]
[V C DAGA, J]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.