In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 20 v. Shri Sunil M. Sekhsaria, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3221 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 20
Versus
Shri Sunil M. Sekhsaria
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.
DATE : 6 August 2010.
P.C. :
1.The appeal arises out of an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 23 January 2009 for assessment year 2003-2004. The assessee has been served and an affidavit of service has been filed. The attention of the Court has been drawn to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Liberty India V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax[1]. We consider it appropriate, in the circumstances, to set aside the impugned order of the Tribunal and to remit the proceedings back to the Tribunal for fresh decision having due regard to the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Liberty India (Supra).
2.The appeal is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.