Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 21, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 21, Mumbai v. Jaihind Co-Op. Housing Society Limited

High Court 07 Mar 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 21, Mumbai v. Jaihind Co-Op. Housing Society Limited
Date of order
07 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 21, Mumbai v. Jaihind Co-Op. Housing Society Limited, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: 1.The question raised in this appeal is whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the amount received by the Society on account of TDR premium for use of additional FSI is not taxable on the ground of mutuality.

Decision: 3.The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4186 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 21, Mumbai Versus Jaihind Co-op. Housing Society Limited ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.Mr.F.V. Irani i/by Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 7[th] March, 2011. 1.The question raised in this appeal is whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the amount received by the Society on account of TDR premium for use of additional FSI is not taxable on the ground of mutuality. The Tribunal following its decision in the case of ITO V/s. Ashoknagar Coop. Housing Society Limited in Income Tax Appeal No.964/Mum/2002 has allowed the claim of the assessee. 2.Learned counsel for the Revenue states that the facts in the present case are similar to the facts in the case of Ashoknagar Coop. Housing Society Limited and that the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Ashoknagar Coop. Housing Society Limited has been accepted by the Revenue. Having accepted the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Ashoknagar Coop. Housing Society Limited, why the present appeal is filed has not been explained. 3.The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs. (Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan