In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 21, Mumbai v. Jaihind Co-Op. Housing Society Limited, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: 1.The question raised in this appeal is whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the amount received by the Society on account of TDR premium for use of additional FSI is not taxable on the ground of mutuality.
Decision: 3.The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4186 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 21, Mumbai
Versus
Jaihind Co-op. Housing Society Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.Mr.F.V. Irani i/by Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 7[th] March, 2011.
1.The question raised in this appeal is whether the Tribunal was
justified in holding that the amount received by the Society on account of TDR premium for use of additional FSI is not taxable on the ground of mutuality. The Tribunal following its decision in the case of ITO V/s. Ashoknagar Coop. Housing Society Limited in Income Tax Appeal No.964/Mum/2002 has allowed the claim of the assessee.
2.Learned counsel for the Revenue states that the facts in the present case are similar to the facts in the case of Ashoknagar Coop. Housing Society Limited and that the decision of the Tribunal in the case of
Ashoknagar Coop. Housing Society Limited has been accepted by the Revenue. Having accepted the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Ashoknagar Coop. Housing Society Limited, why the present appeal is filed has not been explained.
3.The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
(Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.