Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-21, Mumba...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-21, Mumbai … v. M/S. H.l. Builders Mumbai …

High Court 18 Dec 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-21, Mumbai … v. M/S. H.l. Builders Mumbai …
Date of order
18 Dec 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-21, Mumbai … v. M/S. H.l. Builders Mumbai …, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: 17 of 2019 dated 8 August 2019and instructions have been received to withdraw the Appeal.Accordingly, the Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

DDR IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.476 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax-21, Mumbai … AppellantVs.M/s. H.L. Builders Mumbai … Respondent …........ Mr. A.R. Malhotra a/w. Mr. N.A. Kazi for Appellant.Mr. Atul Jasani for respondent. …........ CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR &M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 18 DECEMBER 2019 P.C.:- Learned counsel for the Appellant states that the taxeffect involved in this Appeal is below the threshold limit of Rs.1crore as provided in Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 8 August 2019and instructions have been received to withdraw the Appeal.Accordingly, the Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. 2.Refund of Court Fees as per rules. (M.S.KARNIK, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) DikshaDigitallysigned byDikshaRaneRaneDate:2019.12.1917:28:43+0530
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan