The Commissioner Of Income Tax-21, Mumbai v. M/S Vaman Estate
High Court
21 Aug 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-21, Mumbai v. M/S Vaman Estate
Date of order
21 Aug 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-21, Mumbai v. M/S Vaman Estate, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, we allow the prayer clauses (a) and (a1) inthe notice of motion. [G.S.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION 411 OF 2015
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (ST) NO. 1090 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax-21, Mumbai..ApplicantVs.M/s Vaman Estate..Respondent
..Respondent
....
Mr. Ashok Kotangale a/w Padma Diwakar, Advocate for Applicant.Mr. Atul Jasani, Advocate for Respondent.
....
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.DATED : 21 AUGUST 2015
P.C.:
This notice of motion seeks setting aside the order dated
20 August 2014 dismissing the revenue's appeal and delay of 10days in filing the appeal be condoned
2.We are satisfied for the reason set out in the affidavit in
support. Accordingly, we allow the prayer clauses (a) and (a1) inthe notice of motion.
[G.S. KULKARNI, J]
[M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue