In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 21, Mumbai v. M/S.unique Jewellery, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: P.C. : DATE : 16th November 2011 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 21, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Unique Jewellery
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Ajay R. Singh for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE :
16th November 2011
1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal.
2.Admittedly, the appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleting the quantum addition has been dismissed in default by this Court on 21[st] August 2008 and no steps have been taken to restore that appeal. Thus, the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleting the quantum addition has attained finality.
3.In these circumstances, the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be faulted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.