The Commissioner Of Income Tax-21 v. The Nutan Laxmi Co Operative Housing Society Ltd
High Court
24 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-21 v. The Nutan Laxmi Co Operative Housing Society Ltd
Date of order
24 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-21 v. The Nutan Laxmi Co Operative Housing Society Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: DATE P.C. : In this appeal by the revenue, the following question of law has been proposed for our consideration. a)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT is right in holding that the amount of contribution received by the assessee from transfer and transferee...
Decision: 3 Thus, the appeal is dismissed, with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1140 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-21
versus
..Appellant
The Nutan Laxmi Co Operative Housing Society Ltd...Respondent
--------
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mrs. Aarti Vissanji, Sr. Adv with Mr. S.P. Mehta with Mr. Sudhir Mehta for the Respondent.
.............
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR &
M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE
P.C. :
In this appeal by the revenue, the
following question of law has been proposed for our
consideration.
a)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT is right in holding that the amount of contribution received by the assessee from transfer and transferee members amounting to Rs.39,71,999/- falls in the concept of mutuality?
b)Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT is right in confirming the order of CIT(A) holding that the amount of premium received by the Co. Op. Housing Society on account of utilisation of TDR from its member is not taxable?
2We find that the impugned order of the Tribunal has remanded the issue arising in both the questions to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. This remand by the impugned order was in the light of the decision of this court in the matter of Mittal Court Premises, reported in 328 ITR page 414 and Sind Co.Op. Society, reported in 317 ITR page 47. Since, the matter has been remitted for fresh determination by the Assessing Officer, no questions of law arises for our consideration.
3
Thus, the appeal is dismissed, with no
order as to costs.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.