In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 22 Mumbai v. M/S.warkem, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1140 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 22 Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Warkem, Mumbai
..Respondent.
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.Mr.V.S. Hadade for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 21ST JULY, 2009.
P.C. :
1.Learned counsel appearing for the revenue fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of assessee himself being Income Tax Appeal No.1384 of 2008 decided on 30[th ]March 2009.
2.In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue