Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-22 v. Ani...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-22 v. Anil Nagpal

High Court 11 Jun 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-22 v. Anil Nagpal
Date of order
11 Jun 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-22 v. Anil Nagpal, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, since no substantial question of law arises, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3050 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-22. Vs.Anil Nagpal. .... Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the Appellant.Mr.Atul K.Jasani for the Respondent. ..... ...Appellant. ...Respondent. CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. June 11, 2010. P.C. : We have perused the order of the Tribunal. The reasons which have been indicated by the Tribunal in paragraph 6 for deleting the addition which was made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are justifiable and correct. The appeal will not raise any substantial question of law, particularly in view of the fact that the Tribunal has observed that even in the remand report, it was not the complaint of the Assessing Officer that the credit worthiness and genuineness of transactions was in doubt. Hence, since no substantial question of law arises, the appeal is dismissed. ( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) ( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan