The Commissioner Of Income Tax-22 v. Mahendra M. Chorida
High Court
08 Jan 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-22 v. Mahendra M. Chorida
Date of order
08 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-22 v. Mahendra M. Chorida, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The Appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2472 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-22..Appellant.Vs.Mahendra M. Chorida..Respondent.....
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Dr. K. Shivram with Mr. Ajay Singh and Mr. Sujeeth Karked i/b KSA Legal for the Respondent.
....
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
8[th] January, 2010.
P.C.:
The dispute in the present case pertains to an addition made by the assessing officer of an amount of Rs.21,12,326/- in the course of a block assessment. The CIT (A), according to the Tribunal, had rightly deleted the aforesaid addition since an addition could not be made in the hands of the assessee on the basis of documents found in premises belonging to somebody else. The Tribunal noted that the addition made by the assessing officer on the basis of documents seized during the course of the search in premises belonging to some one else and unsubstantiated by confirmation by any other party could not be added as income in the hands of the assessee merely because some other party had accepted the undisclosed transactions of M/s. Ranka Jewellers. This is a pure
finding of fact. No substantial question of law arises. The Appeal is accordingly dismissed.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.