The Commissioner Of Income Tax-22 v. M/S. Associate Construction Co
High Court
01 Mar 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-22 v. M/S. Associate Construction Co
Date of order
01 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-22 v. M/S. Associate Construction Co, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: DATE : 1st March, 2013 PC: In this appeal by the revenue following questions have been raised for our consideration. a)Whether on facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law in treating the appeal by the revenue against the order dated 22/2/2009 of the CIT(A) as infructuous...
Decision: 3)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1387 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-22.v.M/s. Associate Construction Co.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 1st March, 2013
PC:
In this appeal by the revenue following questions have been raised for our consideration.
a)Whether on facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law in treating the appeal by the revenue against the order dated 22/2/2009 of the CIT(A) as infructuous on the ground that since the order of the CI T u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is cancelled by the Tribunal when the revenue has filed appeal before this court against cancellation of the order u/s.263 by the Tribunal?
b)Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law in quashing the order passed by the Commissioner u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961?
2)
Admittedly, the appeal filed by the revenue being
Income Tax Appeal No.4953 of 2010 has been dismissed on 27/1/2010. The aforesaid appeal was against the order of the Tribunal setting aside the order of the CIT u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”). The present appeal emanates from the order of the Assessing Officer giving effect to the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax u/s. 263 of the Act. However, the order under Section 263 of the Act of the Commissioner of Income Tax has been set aside by the Tribunal and the appeal against the same was not entertained by this Court in its order dated 27/1/2010 in Income Tax Appeal No.4953 of 2010. Therefore, the present appeal does not survive as it is in consequence of the order passed by the CIT under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which itself has been set aside. In this view of the matter, we see no reason to entertain the appeal.
3)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.