The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 23, Mumbai v. Mr.jashwindersingh D. Sohal
High Court
16 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 23, Mumbai v. Mr.jashwindersingh D. Sohal
Date of order
16 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 23, Mumbai v. Mr.jashwindersingh D. Sohal, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.426 OF 2009
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.624 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 23, Mumbai ..Appellant.
Versus
Mr.Jashwindersingh D. Sohal
..Respondent.
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.
Mr.M. Subramaniam i/by Tirupati for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 16[th] JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard. Since the matter is remanded back to the assessing officer, we do not see any substantial question of law arising out of the order of the tribunal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue