The Commissioner Of Income Tax-23 v. Uttamchand C.gandhi (Huf
High Court
06 Jan 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-23 v. Uttamchand C.gandhi (Huf
Date of order
06 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-23 v. Uttamchand C.gandhi (Huf, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2321 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-23. Vs.
...Appellant.
Uttamchand C.Gandhi (HUF).
...Respondent.
....
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr.R.Asokan with Ms.Meghana Butakar i/b. S.C.Tiwari for the Respondent.
.....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
January 6, 2010.
P.C. :
Learned Counsel are agreed in stating before the Court that the questions which arise in this appeal are covered by the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in CIT vs. Uttamchand Jain, 182 Taxman 243 (2009), against the Revenue. In the circumstances, no substantial question of law arises. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue