Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-24, Mumba...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-24, Mumbai v. M/S. Kewalkiran Enterprises

High Court 20 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

20 Aug 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-24, Mumbai v. M/S. Kewalkiran Enterprises, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 266 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax-24, Mumbai. ........Appellant. VersusM/s. Kewalkiran Enterprises. ........Respondent. Mr. R. Ashokan for the Appellant. Mr. J. D. Mistry i/by M/s. Pandya & Co., for the Respondent. CORAM :BILAL NAZKIandA. A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATED :20TH AUGUST, 2008. P.C.: The questions of law framed in this appeal were also framed in IncomeTax Appeal No. 327 of 2007 which has already been dismissed by this Courtby an order dated 12[th] August, 2008. Accordingly, for the same reason thisappeal is also dismissed. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.