Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-24, Mumba...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-24, Mumbai v. M/S. Kewalkiran Enterprises

High Court 20 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

20 Aug 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-24, Mumbai v. M/S. Kewalkiran Enterprises, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (Lodg.) NO. 2730 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax-24, Mumbai. ........Appellant. VersusM/s. Kewalkiran Enterprises. ........Respondent. Mr. R. Ashokan for the Appellant. Mr. J. D. Mistry i/by M/s. Pandya & Co., for the Respondent. CORAM :BILAL NAZKIandA. A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATED :20TH AUGUST, 2008. P.C.: The questions of law framed in this appeal were also framed in IncomeTax Appeal No. 327 of 2007 which has already been dismissed by this Courtby an order dated 12[th] August, 2008. Accordingly, for the same reason thisappeal is also dismissed. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.