In The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 24 v. Arif Ahmed Nandolia, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.Accordingly, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file the same before the appropriate Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 356 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax- 24Vs.
Arif Ahmed Nandolia
...Appellant.
..Respondent.
Ms. Suchitra Kamble for the Appellant.Mr. V.S. Hadade for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ.DATE : 21ST JULY, 2011.
P.C.
1.Since the impugned order is passed by the ITAT at Ahmedabad, learned Counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file the same before the appropriate Court.
2.Accordingly, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file the same before the appropriate Court.
( A.A. SAYED, J. )
( J.P. DEVADHAR , J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue