Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax - 24 v. K...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax - 24 v. Kewalkiran Enterprises

High Court 09 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

09 Sep 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax - 24 v. Kewalkiran Enterprises, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 235 of 2007, on 12[th] and 20[th] August,2008, this appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1634 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income-tax - 24 ...Appellant Versus Kewalkiran Enterprises ... Respondents. Mr. R. Asokan for the Appellant Mr. J.D. Mistry i/by M/s. Pandya & Co. for the Respondents. CORAM:B ILAL NAZKIand A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2008 P.C.:- In view of the dismissal of group of matters, with lead matterbeing Income Tax Appeal No. 235 of 2007, on 12[th] and 20[th] August,2008, this appeal stands dismissed. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.