In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 24 v. M/S.balaji Developers, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 707 OF 2012
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2509 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 24
..... Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Balaji Developers
..... Respondent
Mr.A.K.Saxena for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &R.D. DHANUKA, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 25, 2012
P.C.:
The Appeal has been dismissed for non-removable of the office objections in
pursuance of an Order dated 10 August 2011 passed by the Prothonotary & Senior Master. The Motion is for condoning the delay and for restoration of the
Appeal. The Learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the Motion has been served. Sufficient cause has been shown. The Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
R.D. DHANUKA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue