Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 24 v. M...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 24 v. M/S.balaji Developers

High Court 25 Apr 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 24 v. M/S.balaji Developers
Date of order
25 Apr 2012
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 24 v. M/S.balaji Developers, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The revenue has raised the following question of law :- Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble ITAT is justified in deleting the addition of Rs.5,40,000/- without appreciating that the ITXA2508_11 information of taking on money was given by no other person than th...

Decision: 2509 of 2011, the present Appeal will not raise any substantial question of law and is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2508 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 24 ..... Appellant Vs. M/s.Balaji Developers ..... Respondent Mr.A.K.Saxena for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &R.D. DHANUKA, JJ. DATE : APRIL 25, 2012 P.C.: On the Appeal being restored, it has been taken on Board on the request of the Learned Counsel and has been called out. 2.This Appeal arises from a decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 7 September 2010. The Assessment Year to which the Appeal relates is A.Y.2004 – 05. The revenue has raised the following question of law :- Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble ITAT is justified in deleting the addition of Rs.5,40,000/- without appreciating that the ITXA2508_11 information of taking on money was given by no other person than the partner of the assessee firm ? 3.The Learned Counsel for the Revenue states that the appeal is companion to the appeal against the order for A.Y. 2005-06. The Appeal filed by the Revenue for A.Y. 2005-06 has been dismissed by the Order passed today in Income Tax Appeal No. 2509 of 2011. No separate issue is urged in the present Appeal. For the reasons already indicated while dismissing Income Tax Appeal No. 2509 of 2011, the present Appeal will not raise any substantial question of law and is accordingly dismissed. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. R.D. DHANUKA, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan