In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 24 v. M/S.balaji Developers, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1036 OF 2012ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2508 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 24
..... Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Balaji Developers
..... Respondent
Mr.A.K.Saxena for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &
R.D. DHANUKA, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 25, 2012
P.C.:
Not on Board. Mentioned.
2.In view of the order which has been passed in the companion Notice of Motion No. 707 of 2012 in Income Tax Appeal No. 2509 of 2011, the present Notice of Motion and the Appeal have been taken on the Board on the request of the Learned Counsel for the Appellant and have been called out. The Notice of Motion seeks condonation of delay and restoration of the Appeal which has been dismissed for non-compliance with the order for removing of office objections.
The Learned Counsel submits that the Motion has been served. Sufficient cause has been shown. Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
R.D. DHANUKA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue