The Commissioner Of Income Tax-25, Mumbai v. Puri
High Court
28 Jan 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-25, Mumbai v. Puri
Date of order
28 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-25, Mumbai v. Puri, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1250 OF 2012ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.707 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax-25, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.
Smt. Amita V. Puri
..Respondent.
Mr. Tejveer Singh for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjiv M. Shah for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATED : 28TH JANUARY, 2013
P.C. :-
1.For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, the delay is condoned in filing the appeal. Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2.Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue