In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 25, Mumbai v. Shri Manmohan M. Modi (Huf, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, thus, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.846 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 25, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
Shri Manmohan M. Modi (HUF)
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 2[nd] July, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The question of law sought to be raised in this appeal revolves around findings of fact based on appreciation of evidence. No fault can be found with the order of the tribunal. The appeal is, thus, dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue