Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-25 v. Rek...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-25 v. Rekha Khandelwal

High Court 08 Jan 2013 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

08 Jan 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-25 v. Rekha Khandelwal, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn, with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1002 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax-25versus Rekha Khandelwal ..Appellant ..Respondent -------- Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. ............. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 08[th] January, 2013 P.C.: Since the ITAT has remanded the matter back for fresh decision, Counsel for the Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn, with no order as to costs. Refund of court fees as per law is allowed. (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.