In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-25 v. Sharad G. Upadhye. )........ Respondant, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Noquestion of law much less substantial question of law is involved.Hence appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 390 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income tax-25 ).......Appellant
versus
Sharad G. Upadhye. )........ Respondant.
Mr. A. Abhay i./b Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., &
A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
DATED: 16TH JULY 2008.
P.C.:
1.The counsel for the appellant states that thr questionof law raised in the present appeal is swuarely covered by thejudgment of the Supreme Court in the case of 273 ITR 5. Noquestion of law much less substantial question of law is involved.Hence appeal stands dismissed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue