The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-26 Mumbai v. Herbert Schultz
High Court
14 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-26 Mumbai v. Herbert Schultz
Date of order
14 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-26 Mumbai v. Herbert Schultz, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2133 OF 2006
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.1098 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.1098 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income-tax-26 Mumbai..Appellant
Versus
Herbert Schultz ..Respondent
----
Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE,JJ
Coram : F.I.REBELLO &
R.S.MOHITE,JJ
Date : 14.01.2008.
PC
1. As the tax incidence is less than Rs.4 lakhs,
learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Notice
of Motion and the appeal. The Notice of Motion and
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Question of law, if
any, is left open for consideration in an
appropriate case. Refund of court fees as per
rules. Certified copy expedited.
(R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J)
(R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue