In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 26 v. Divyesh N. Shah, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1490 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 26..Appellant.
Versus
Divyesh N. Shah
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 14TH SEPTEMBER 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant. It is not in dispute that no independent material after retraction is available with the revenue. If that be so, no fault can be found with the view taken by the tribunal. The appeal is without any substance. The appeal is accordingly dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue