The Commissioner Of Income Tax-26 v. Mrs.meena S.bokil
High Court
03 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-26 v. Mrs.meena S.bokil
Date of order
03 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-26 v. Mrs.meena S.bokil, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1623 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1623 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1623 OF 2008
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.654 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.654 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-26 .. Appellant
Vs.
Mrs.Meena S.Bokil .. Respondent
None for the Appellant.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.
DATE : 3rd June, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. None appears for the Appellant. Notice of
Motion stands dismissed in default.
2. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion for
condonation of delay, Income Tax Appeal (L) No.654/2008
also stands dismissed.
(A.P.BHANGALE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(A.P.BHANGALE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue