The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2,Mumbai v. Hardik Paints Pvt. Ltd
High Court
21 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2,Mumbai v. Hardik Paints Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
21 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2,Mumbai v. Hardik Paints Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2727 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-2,Mumbai )..AppellantVs.Hardik Paints Pvt. Ltd., )..Respondents
)..Respondents
----
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Mr. S.E.Dastur Senior Counsel @ Mr.P.J.Pardiwala Sr.Counsel and Mr.A.K.Jasani for the respondents.
----
CORAM : J. P .DEVADHAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 21/2/2011.
PC
1The question raised in this appeal is “whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the PVC Erasers produced by the assessee are manufactured items and entitled to deduction under Section 80 IA of the Income Tax Act 1961 ?
a conclusion that the activity carried on by the assessee amounts to manufacturing activity and hence entitled to deduction under Section 80IA of the Act. It is pertinent to note that under the Central Excise Act, production of erasers constitutes manufacture and hence excisable under a distinct heading. By General Exemption No.54 dated 10.2.1986 the Central Government has granted total exemption for payment of excise duty on manufacture of erasers. In these circumstances the decision of the Tribunal that producing PVC erasers amounts to manufacture and hence the assessee is entitled to section 80IA deduction cannot be faulted. Dismissed.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.