The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd
High Court
14 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd
Date of order
14 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1449 OF 2010
A N D INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1454 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Mumbai )..AppellantsVs.Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., )..Respondents
----
Mr. Vimal Guptal for the appellants.
Mr. J.D. Mistry Sr. Counsel @ Mr. A. K. Jasani for the respondents.
----
CORAM : J. P .DEVADHAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 14/2/2011.
PC
1Counsel on both sides agree that the order of the ITAT against which these appeals have been filed already have been set
aside by this Court and the matter is remanded back to the ITAT
for de-novo consideration in Income Tax Appeal No.685 of 2010
and Writ Petition No.1894 of 2010 decided on 20.9.2010. Hence, both these appeals have become infructuous and accordingly dismissed.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue