The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. Birla Yamaha Ltd
High Court
02 May 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. Birla Yamaha Ltd
Date of order
02 May 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. Birla Yamaha Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3217 OF 2010
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 6799 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Mumbai
Vs.
Birla Yamaha Ltd.
..Appellant.
.. Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.
Mr. S.J. Mehta for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
P.C.
DATE : 2ND MAY, 2011.
1.Heard.
2. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of notice of motion,
delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
3.Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer (a).
( A.A. SAYED, J. )
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue